Does Hebrews 6:4-6 Teach That It Is Possible To Lose Salvation?

does hebrews 646 teach that it is possible to lose salvation? 1In my view, the crowd of 5 point Arminians seems to be quickly dissipating. Most people who I am aware of do not think that it is possible for a true believer to lose their salvation. In fact, even Jacob Arminius thought that it was an open question and too difficult to answer. But those who want to hold fast to this view will usually use Hebrews 6:4-6 as a proof text, arguing that it teaches that these people are born again, experiencing the regeneration of the Holy Spirit, and then falling away into eternal damnation. Are they correct? Does Hebrews 6:4-6 teach that it is possible to lose salvation?

does hebrews 646 teach that it is possible to lose salvation? 2It reads, “For in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to open shame.” Does Hebrews 6:4-6 teach that it is possible to lose salvation? I think one can certainly see the gravity of their argument just by reading this passage by itself. But wait a moment. Look at the first word of this selection. For. The author is referring back to something that he said before. This was not written in a vacuum. It has a context. An audience. A problem that is being dealt with.

To Whom Is Hebrews Written? The content of this letter seems to suggest that those to whom it was written were familiar with the Old Testament Scriptures. It frequently appeals to the Hebrew Bible to persuasively make a case to the readers (1:5, 1:6-12, 1:13; 2:6-8, 2:12, 2:13; 3:7-11, 3:15; 4:3, 4:4, 4:5; 5:5-6; 6:14; 7:17, 7:21; 8:8-12; 9:20; 10:5-7, 10:16, 10:17, 10:37-39; 11:12, 11:18; 12:5-6, 12:20, 12:26; 13:5, 13:6). Those who received this letter were familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures and accepted them as authoritative, and believed the gospel of Jesus. They were probably Jewish converts.

But new converts often struggle to fall back into their own way of life. Just as the Pagans to whom Paul wrote were tempted to worship other gods, the Jews were tempted to return to the tradition that they have lived with for their entire lives, and are told that they need to hold fast to their trust in and confession of Christ (3:14-16, 4:14, 10:23).

These Jewish converts were struggling with their faith. In the section leading up to Hebrews 6:4-6, the author says that they have heard the gospel, but have been dull of hearing and are difficult to talk to (5:11). They have been Christians for a long time, and by this point, they should have been able to teach (5:12a) but still struggle to understand elementary principles of theology (5:12b). He tells them that they are infants, only ready to drink milk, but not ready to eat food (5:13-14).

Therefore, since you are so immature… The author says that since they are so immature, he is not going to expound on deep theological doctrine. He needs to again preach to them the elementary things so that they can understand (6:1a). He tells them that he is not going to lay a foundation of dead works (6:1b). In saying this, he is referring to the sacrificial system that the Jewish converts were tempted to return. With this necessary background knowledge, we come to the principle text, Hebrews 6:4-6.

You who have tasted the Heavenly gift (v. 4)… He speaks of those who have once been enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, the Holy Spirit, the word of God, and the power of God. He is describing these Jewish converts who saw the gospel of Christ, the fulfillment of the promise of the prophets, and perhaps they even were born again (though it does not explicitly say that they were, even though it is likely that at least one of them was). A lot of people want to interpret this passage by saying that those to whom it is referring were not really born again. However I think that is evidence of reading our views into the text. Probably, these people were genuinely born again (after all, the author talks in Hebrews 12 about how the Spirit will chastise them and guard them). But this is where it becomes interesting. The author writes that those who may really have been born again, have the potential to fall away.

…and then fallen away… (v. 6) Fallen away into what? The Arminians want to say that they had fallen away into condemnation. They once tasted the Heavenly gift, and now they are no longer Christians. But that does not seem to be in context. The author does not mention condemnation. He mentions doctrinal error. They have fallen away into a system of doctrinal error. Though, that is not to say that they considered leaving their faith in Christ behind. Nowhere does the author mention that. They are not considering leaving their salvation behind. They are considering drifting into doctrinal error.

That is why the author goes on to say that they crucify the Son of God afresh (v. 6). The sacrifices of the Jewish system were always meant to memorialize Christ. But Christ needs only to be sacrificed once and for all. That is why the author made a point to emphasize the sacrifice of Christ once and for all (10:10). These people were going to fall away into doctrinal error wherein they offer the old sacrifices that were but a shadow of the things to come. But still regenerate Christians. There is no text to suggest that they were considering leaving their faith. They still trusted in Christ for their salvation. Just falling away into doctrinal error.

…it is impossible to renew them to repentance… (v.6b) This is the part that usually makes Arminians rather uncomfortable. After all, if this verse is referring to salvation, that would imply that when somebody loses their salvation, it is impossible for them to repent again. Arminians, have they lost their free will, along with their salvation? However as I pointed out, it is not referring to salvation but doctrinal error. It is impossible for them to be renewed at that point. Why is that?

Well, I confess that this verse is puzzling, no matter what side you are on. After all, is it impossible to convince somebody to change their religion or traditional practices? Well… have you ever tried it? It sometimes does seem as though it is impossible! They are so ensconced in their tradition that it seems impossible to change their mind. Thus I am reduced to saying that I think the author is speaking in more practical, rather than absolute, terms. It is pretty hard, even impossible, to bring somebody to repent of their religious system. But still, this leaves us on better grounds than the Arminian who wants to say that this is referring to salvation.

Does Hebrews 6:4-6 teach that it is possible to lose salvation? It seems to me that if one is to believe that, they have to depart from the basic principles of biblical interpretation. They have to isolate this verse from its’ context. They have to pay no attention to the audience to whom it was written. They have to read their theology into the text. Indeed, this passage is silent about whether it is possible for one to lose salvation.

If you would like to get in on the discussion about this, join my Theology Discussion Group!



Related posts